The author has a way with words and metaphors to explain constructs and research-based findings that is not in my repertoire. RAPT is correct in indicating that the development of laser-beam focus, where one shuts down the spontaneous private talk directed by the attentional capturing pirates, is a difficult skill-but it can be trained. Achieving intense focus or flow-like states can enhance cognitive performance, and perhaps (as the author suggests) a more rewarding life.

RAPT is on target in confirming the link between controlled attentional focus and some forms of meditation. Nevertheless, the book does include important insights regarding the more narrow focus I write about as an outcome of IM training. Also, the laser like focus on the most critical information in your working memory (which is what IM is about) is a much narrower concept than a more global philosophy of life (“your life is the creation of what you focus on-and what you don’t”). I do not agree 100% with all Gallagher suggests, as with any single prescription for the ultimate way to live one’s life, it tends to overreach at times. It is with this background that I find RAPT to be of considerable interest. However, unfettered mind wandering can allow for creative thought (and also the flip side-ruminations of irrational or bad thoughts). The mind wandering of the default brain networkneeds to be shut down to focus. However, 100% laser beam focus is not attainable, nor would one want to constantly be super focused. By this I mean one wants to train your brain to invoke focused attention when facing cognitively demanding tasks. I have further suggested that “ on demand focus” is a potentially powerful tool.

I have been reading Winfred Gallagher’s 2009 book “ RAPT: Attention and the focused life.” In many of my blog posts I maintain that Interactive Metronome (IM) training requires controlled attention-focus.

Rapt with attention